» MICHAEL SAVAGE NEWSLETTER: Only in America

http://www.michaelsavage.wnd.com/2016/08/michael-savage-newsletter-only-in-america/


Sent from my iPad

PEOPLE, WE ARE in DEEP TROUBLE!!!!!!!!!

We must have overwhelming military strength ( includes Space also). The liberal, globalist , one world government nuts ( includes dems, lib R's, ) are anti Amerign Soverignity muslim lovers WANT to do away with our system of gov.
This adm has seriously weakened our military & space capabilities.
We better get this anti American bunch out, & reestablish our capabilities!
To do this, please contact your senators & reps. Our way of life is dependent on the USA being the one & only super power!

Sent from my iPad

Myth vs. Reality

Sunday, April 13, 2014 Myth vs. Reality --Space dollars to Russia!!! 4. Cost of Shuttle Based System is Far Less Than the Constellation System or the Proposed Obama System This claim results from simple arithmetic. At a shuttle cost per mission of 500 million for the round trip transport of 6 astronauts, the per man cost of shuttle transport is 80 million. The system to be developed in the Constellation program or the Obama plan would duplicate the Russian Soyuz system. The Russians are to be paid 50 million per astronaut per trip. When the huge cost to develop a new U S system is added in, the resulting per seat cost would greatly exceed that of the existing shuttle system. Considering the cargo superiority of the shuttle makes the shuttle system even more cost effective, and it is in place now, no interruption, no space dollars spent overseas. Origin and Impetus for the Redirection Six years ago the Bush Administration unilaterally redirected the manned space program to (1) terminate the shuttle system and (2) to recreate the Apollo system, consisting of large boosters and a capsule and parachute crew transport system. If you accept the SAT positions why did NASA opt for the redirection and for and sustain the disassembly of a 200 billion dollar Space Shuttle System? One can only speculate but one reason for the redirection could have been a nostalgic desire within the NASA leadership and the Bush Administration to remake the Apollo experience. A second and perhaps more compelling reason could been a desire within NASA leadership to reclaim the prestige associated with creating a new massive heavy lift vehicle similar to the Apollo Saturn V. . The Obama Administration has basically endorsed the redirection by supporting creation of a new heavy lift vehicle, the return to a capsule and parachute system and allowing the termination of the more advanced shuttle system to continue. Pressure has apparently been put on pro shuttle astronauts to stifle it. Again one can only speculate as to the reason. Certainly any desire within NASA for new heavy lift vehicle would be ongoing.The fact that two presidents have sided with the heavy lift segment of NASA shows the power of this group. On the president's side it one could add - lack of vision, political pressure, and the effects of the anti shuttle propaganda. It makes one wonder if the SAT information reached him. Anti Shuttle Propaganda Part of the shuttle termination initiative has been a deceptive ongoing anti shuttle propaganda campaign by a cadre of " Space Experts"and the then NASA Administrator. The PBS Columbia Documentary is the most extensive example. In it the shuttles are labeled as "worn out, old technology, too risky, too costly, a mistake and not capable of supporting solar system exploration" none of which is true.The initiative has been very effective and after six years the anti shuttle rhetoric has become a media myth. Myth versus Reality Even with the approaching termination of the Public's 200 billion dollar shuttle system the nation still has a choice. Considering the facts above it is clear the reality is the shuttle based system for space exploration is the correct choice both technically and financially. . The press could make the difference. SAT has approached numerous media publications with our message and they have chosen to continue to support the myth. These include PBS, the NY Times ,Flight International, the Orange County Register, NASA News and the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. It is my hope that you will read the pro shuttle information noted and will arrange for me to meet with you and your editor for a one hour question and answer session. It is your choice as to time place and agenda. It is vital to the nation that someone of your stature in the press investigates and acts on this information. I have an impressive list of engineer sources (Bob Thompson and three former Chief Engineers for a start) ready to answer any question you might have, people you would be honored, as I am, to associate with and people who are true space experts. By Interviewing these guys you would become the most space shuttle knowledgeable reporter on the planet. Without media support to get our message out the shuttle legacy will probably be similar to that of the Titanic and the Hindenberg, manned space travel will regress fifty years, the Public's money invested in the Space Shuttle System will have been wasted, and America's leadership in space will be forfeited. Allen Richardson SAT Spokesman Sent from my iPad

Sent from my iPad

Commercial approach inadequate for assuring absolute control of EO which is critical to maintaining US security !

OVERWHELMING Military Strength Must BE MAINTAINED by US INCLUDING IN SPACE ( this ADM has destroyed what Capability the US had)

Unless we reverse direction in near future, the US will be controlled by China or Russia as a result of their superior military space capabilities.
You may think this is a joke, but all you have to do is keep you head in the sand & wait. IT is coming! Better let your reps & senators know how you feel, since the majority are completely out of touch with was is going on!!

Sent from my iPad

Fwd: Oh No!!!---- Not Another Spacex Anomaly ( NASA)

Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Robert Hooi" <rwlh21@sbcglobal.net>
Date: September 1, 2016 at 11:04:02 PM CDT
To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:;>
Subject: Oh No!!!
Reply-To: "Robert Hooi" <rwlh21@sbcglobal.net>

Oh No!!! It's N.A.S.A. (Not Another SpaceX Anomaly)............

FBI Deliberately Attempts To Bury Bombshell Investigation Notes Over Holiday Weekend | US Defense Watch

http://usdefensewatch.com/2016/09/fbi-deliberately-attempts-to-bury-bombshell-investigation-notes-over-holiday-weekend/


Sent from my iPad